Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Lay v. City of Lowell et al
as 1:2024cv10514
Plaintiff:
Dominik Hok Lay
Defendant:
City of Lowell, Christine P. O'Connor, Elliott Veloso and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Daddeh et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2023cv13116
Plaintiff:
Louise Harris Daddeh
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, City of Lowell, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Metro Builders Supply, Inc. et al v. City of Lowell, Arkansas et al
as 5:2023cv05229
Plaintiff:
Metro Builders Supply, Inc. and Metro Builders Supply of Rogers, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Lowell, Arkansas, Chris Moore, Elizabeth Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moujaes et al v. Bowler et al
as 1:2021cv10555
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Stephen M Alexander, Nathan D Bowler and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Moujaes and Nadim Moujaes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moujaes et al v. City of Lowell, The et al
as 1:2021cv10548
Plaintiff:
Michael Moujaes and Nadim Moujaes
Defendant:
Steven M Alexander, Nathan D Bowler and City of Lowell, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11861
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario v. Waterhouse et al
as 1:2019cv10532
Defendant:
William M Gilligan, John R Myers, City of Lowell and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Rosario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
