Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Chao v. City of Plano, Texas et al
as 4:2021cv00312
Defendant:
City of Plano, Texas, Kyle Watson, Lori Schwarz and others
Plaintiff:
James T. Chao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Women's Elevated Sober Living LLC et al v. City of Plano, Texas
as 4:2019cv00412
Defendant:
City of Plano, Texas
Plaintiff:
Constance Swanston, Women's Elevated Sober Living LLC and Shannon Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Elevated Women's Sober Living LLC et al v. City of Plano,Texas
as 4:2019cv00411
Defendant:
City of Plano,Texas
Plaintiff:
Elevated Women's Sober Living LLC and Constance Swanston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watson v. City of Allen et al
as 4:2015cv00335
Plaintiff:
James H Watson
Defendant:
City of Allen, Texas , City of Amarillo, Texas, City of Arlington, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cosgrove et al v. City of Plano, Texas
as 4:2013cv00660
Plaintiff:
Roberta Cosgrove and Connie Cosgrove
Defendant:
City of Plano, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spikin v. City of Plano, Texas et al
as 2:2011cv00230
Defendant:
City of Plano, Texas and Paul Malcom
Plaintiff:
Michelle Spikin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spikin v. City of Plano, Texas et al
as 4:2011cv00598
Defendant:
City of Plano, Texas and Paul Malcom
Plaintiff:
Michelle Spikin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pipes v. Dell Computers et al
as 4:2010cv00094
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Pipes
Defendant:
Dell Computers, Trusswal, Parago, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florance v. Bush et al
as 3:2009cv01470
Plaintiff:
Richard John Florance, Jr
Defendant:
Don Bush, David J. Maland, Carolyn Dineen King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Propes v. City of Plano Police Department et al
as 4:2009cv00055
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Propes, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Plano Police Department, City of Plano Texas and Kristina Knight
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
