Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Wolf et al v. City Of Port Arthur et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Abraham Charles Wolf and Rema Charles Wolf
Defendant:
City Of Port Arthur, Thomas Pierre Darlene, Ronnie Mickens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City of Port Arthur Texas v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05600
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
City of Port Arthur Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wolf v. City of Port Arthur
as 23-40528
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rema Charles Wolf
Appellant:
Abraham Charles Wolf
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Port Arthur, Darlene Thomas-Pierre, Ronnie Mickens and others
Thomas v. City of Port Arthur, Texas
as 1:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Kirk Thomas
Defendant:
City of Port Arthur, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Grogan v. City of Port Arthur Police Dept et al
as 1:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Michael D Grogan
Defendant:
City of Port Arthur Police Dept, TML Insurance Adjuster and Jeff Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gutierrez v. City of Port Arthur
as 1:2021cv00257
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PORT ARTHUR
Plaintiff:
ARMANDO GUTIERREZ, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
