Cases 1 - 10 of 17
BVCV High Point, LLC v. The City of Prattville, Alabama et al
as 2:2021cv00821
Plaintiff:
BVCV High Point, LLC
Defendant:
The City of Prattville, Alabama, Jerry Starnes, John Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jackson v. Griffith et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00813
Plaintiff:
Jalon D. Jackson
Defendant:
Charlette Griffith, Louis Colley, Terri Mathis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00522
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
City of Prattville, Alabama v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45783
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma Inc, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. F/K/A ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. F/K/A/ JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA, INC., INSYS THERAPEUTIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Prattville, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00139
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Marshall v. City of Prattville et al (MAG+)
as 2:2016cv00857
Plaintiff:
Rosharee Marshall
Defendant:
City of Prattville, Autauga County Department of Human Resources and Nolan Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Prattville, AL.
as 2:2016cv00565
Plaintiff:
Steve Williams
Defendant:
City of Prattville, AL.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Sima Properties, L.L.C. v. Cooper et al
as 2:2016cv00163
Plaintiff:
Sima Properties, L.L.C.
Defendant:
John R. Cooper and City of Prattville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lee v. City of Prattville et al
as 2:2013cv00573
Plaintiff:
Chang Ho Lee
Defendant:
City of Prattville , Steven Geon , Tom Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
