Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv03090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Tap House Real Estate, LLC v. City of Rochester
as 0:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
Tap House Real Estate, LLC
Defendant:
City of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jerk King, Inc. v. City of Rochester et al
as 0:2021cv02545
Plaintiff:
Jerk King, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Rochester and Destination Medical Center Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2021cv02437
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, All current DHS-MSOP employees, Jodi Harpstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Menasi v. Metz et al
as 0:2021cv01100
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Jake Metz and City of Rochester
Plaintiff:
Esaias Joseph Menasi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fillner v. Fritz et al
as 0:2020cv00849
Defendant:
Edward Fritz and City of Rochester
Plaintiff:
Ashley Anne Fillner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fillner v. Fritz et al
as 0:2020cv00848
Defendant:
Edward Fritz and City of Rochester
Plaintiff:
Ashley Anne Fillner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell et al v. City of Rochester, et al
as 0:2019cv01846
Plaintiff:
James Campbell and Sarah Louisell
Defendant:
Rochester Economic Development Authority and City of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
City of Rochester, Minnesota v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 0:2019cv01317
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Rochester, City of and City of Rochester, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
