Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Graham v. City of St. Louis, Missouri
as 3:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Empl Ret Sys of St. Louis, et al v. Charles Jones, et al
as 23-3512
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Derivatively on behalf of FirstEnergy Corp., ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND, LOCAL 103, I.B.E.W., Co-Lead Plaintiff - Case No. 2:20-cv-5128, MASSACHUSETTS LABORERS PENSION FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of FirstEnergy Corp. Case No. 2:20-cv-5237 and others
Appellant:
TODD AUGENBAUM
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES E. JONES, MICHAEL J. ANDERSON, STEVEN J. DEMETRIOU and others
Empls Ret Sys of St. Louis, et al v. Charles Jones, et al
as 21-3993
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Derivatively on behalf of FirstEnergy Corp., ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND, LOCAL 103, I.B.E.W., Co-Lead Plaintiff - Case No. 2:20-cv-5128, MASSACHUSETTS LABORERS PENSION FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of FirstEnergy Corp. Case No. 2:20-cv-5237 and others
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JONES
Defendant / Appellant:
FIRSTENERGY CORP and FIRSTENERGY CORP.
Jennifer Miller v. Michael Anderson, et al
as 21-3854
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JENNIFER L. MILLER, Derivatively on behalf of other FirstEnergy Corporation
Intervenor / Appellee:
LOCAL 103, ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND, I.B.E.W., EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MASSACHUSETTS LABORERS PENSION FUND and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ANDERSON, et al.
Defendant / Appellant:
FIRST ENERGY CORPORATION, Nominal Defendant and FIRSTENERGY CORP., Nominal Defendant
The City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement v. Anderson et al
as 2:2020cv05529
Defendant:
Thomas N Mitchell, K. Jon Taylor, Charles E. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement
Intervenor:
Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W. and Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis v. Jones et al
as 1:2020cv00705
Defendant:
Charles E Jones, Steven E. Strah, Steven J. Demetriou and others
Plaintiff:
Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis v. Jones et al
as 2:2020cv04813
Defendant:
Charles E Jones, James F O'Neil, III, Steven E. Strah and others
Plaintiff:
Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis and Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W.
Petitioner:
Massachusetts Laborer Pension Fund Derivatively on Behalf of FirstEnergy Corp
Interested Party:
City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Roberta Bloom, James Atherton, Arlene Pogolowitz and others
Consolidated Defendant:
John Does 1-50
Not Classified By Court:
Edward Orr, Todd Augenbaum and John Donovan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Miller v. Anderson et al
as 5:2020cv01743
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Miller
Defendant:
Christopher D. Pappas, Charles E. Jones, Donald T. Misheff and others
Intervenor:
Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W., Local 103, Electrical Workers Pension Fund, I.B.E.W., Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis and others
Petitioner:
Massachusetts Laborer Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
City of Chicago, IL, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-4183
Petitioner:
CITY OF TUMWATER, WA, CITY OF DENVER, CO AND DENVER COUNTY, CO, CITY OF LACEY, WA and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Not Yet Classified:
NCTA - THE INTERNET & TELEVSION ASSOCIATION
City of St. Louis v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2018op46267
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma Inc, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
