Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Molitor v. Sulphur
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Michael Molitor
Defendant:
City of Sulphur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01868
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Polnac v. City of Sulphur Springs, City of, et al
as 4:2020cv00666
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POLNAC
Defendant:
JOSHUA DAVIS, City of Sulphur Springs, Texas, JUSTIN FINDLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Claro v. City of Sulphur, et al
as 19-7069
Defendant / Appellee:
MURRAY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, WILLIAM ODOM, in his individual capacity, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANIS CLARO, as next friend and Guardian of Lisa C. Schaapveld, an incapacitated person
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01506
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Carol Vincent v. City of Sulphur, et al
as 17-30776
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROL J. VINCENT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SULPHUR, LEWIS COATS, City of Sulphur Police Chief, DON BRISCOE, Officer and others
Vincent v. Sulphur et al
as 2:2017cv00573
Plaintiff:
Carol J Vincent
Defendant:
City of Sulphur, Lewis Coats, Briscoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carol Vincent v. City of Sulphur, et al
as 17-30056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROL J. VINCENT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SULPHUR, LEWIS COATS, CHESTER GREMILLION and others
Liu v. Hopkins County et al
as 4:2016cv00694
Plaintiff:
Hao Liu
Defendant:
Hopkins County , City of Sulphur Springs and Unnamed Individual
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
