Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02764
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Clarence Jackson v. Mark Goodwin, et al
as 23-1485
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE B. JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee: MARK S. GOODWIN, FIRST FINANCIAL BANK and DAVIS AND DELANOIS LAW FIRM
Clarence Jackson v. State of Illinois, et al
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE B. JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF ILLINOIS and ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv05265
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Clarence Jackson v. State of Illinois, et al
as 20-2718
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE B. JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF ILLINOIS and ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Bureau of Heraings c/o Division of Vocational Rehabilitational Services
Clarence Jackson v. Andrew Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-3021
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE B. JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee: ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
JACKSON v. JIC II, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01222
Defendant: JIC II, LLC and CLARENCE H. JACKSON, JR.
Plaintiff: KENNYA A. JACKSON
Clarence Jackson v. Nancy Berryhill
as 19-8002
Respondent: NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Petitioner: CLARENCE B. JACKSON
Jackson v. Flournoy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00045
Petitioner: Clarence Noble Jackson
Respondent: Victor Flournoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In re: Clarence Jackson
as 16-13845
Petitioner: In re: CLARENCE NOBLE JACKSON
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?