Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Patterson v. Teide Enterprises Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00541
Plaintiff:
Erwin B. Patterson, Jr.
Defendant:
Teide Enterprises Inc., Sara A. John, Stuart Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patterson v. Teide Enterprises Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00434
Plaintiff:
Erwin B. Patterson, Jr.
Defendant:
Teide Enterprises Inc., Sara A. John, Stuart Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Erwin Patterson, Jr. v. John C. Lumpkin P.C.
as 08-2268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C.
Defendant - None:
CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STEPHEN E. MILLS and others
Erwin Patterson, Jr. v. City of Chesapeake
as 08-1928
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, STEPHEN E. MILLS, JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C. and others
Defendant - None:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, TOWNE BANK, CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Erwin Patterson, Jr. v. City of Chesapeake
as 08-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STEPHEN E. MILLS and others
Clarendon National Insurance Company v. The City of Buckhannon, West Virginia
as 2:2008cv00017
Plaintiff:
Clarendon National Insurance Company and Clarendon National Insurance Company
Defendant:
The City of Buckhannon, West Virginia
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Forth's Foods, Inc. et al v. Allied Benefit Administrators, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00337
Plaintiff:
Forth's Foods, Inc., Forth's Foods, Inc., Forth's Foods, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Allied Benefit Administrators, Inc., Allied Benefit Administrators, Inc., Andrea Bellue Mills and others
Cross Claimant:
Physician Services, L.C. and Physician Services, L.C.
Cross Defendant:
Allied Benefit Administrators, Inc. and Allied Benefit Administrators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
