Cases 71 - 80 of 203
Anderson et al v. Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C. et al
as 2:2017cv13289
Plaintiff:
Cyrstal Anderson , T. G. , M. L. and others
Defendant:
Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C., Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc., Leo A. Daly Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk et al v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2017cv00589
Plaintiff:
Ernest Kirk and Claudia Kirk
Defendant:
Calhoun, County of , Matthew Saxton , Brandy Edmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Comerica Bank v. Enagic Co. Ltd. et al
as 2:2017cv11131
Plaintiff:
Comerica Bank
Defendant:
Enagic Co. Ltd., Enagic USA, Inc., Jon Swardstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Brown et al v. Terex Advance Mixer, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00234
Plaintiff:
Jon Kevin Brown and Claudia Brown
Defendant:
Terex Advance Mixer, Inc., Terex Corporation and Ernst Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown et al v. Terex Advance Mixer, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
Jon Kevin Brown and Claudia Brown
Defendant:
Terex Advance Mixer, Inc., Terex Corporation and Ernst Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kirk v. Calhoun County et al
as 2:2016cv13766
Plaintiff:
Ernest Kirk and Dr. Claudia Kirk
Defendant:
Calhoun County, Sheriff Matthew Saxton, Sergeant Brandy Edmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv12964
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
