Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 102
WU v. BARASCH et al
as 2:2024cv01202
Plaintiff: WEIDING WU
Defendant: RICHARD BARASCH, LUKE MCGEE, STEPHEN P. GRIGGS and others
Charles ClemensIn re: Charles Clemens
as 24-1471
Petitioner: In re: CHARLES CLEMENS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CLEMENS v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01869
Defendant: LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff: SHEILA CLEMENS
Not Yet Classified: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00796
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Urve Maggitti v. William Mahon, et al
as 23-3275
Plaintiff: URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant: WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Berlin Brown v. G. Clemens, et al
as 23-3213
Plaintiff: BERLIN VANARDO BROWN
Defendant: CCPM CLEMENS, PREA Coordinator SCI-Camp Hill
CLEMENS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv04595
Plaintiff: CHARLES CLEMENS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MAGGITTI v. MAHON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv04359
Plaintiff: URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant: WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALLEGHENY COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, v. ADAPTHEALTH CORP. et al
as 2:2023cv04104
Plaintiff: ALLEGHENY COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM,
Defendant: ADAPTHEALTH CORP., LUKE MCGEE, Joshua Parnes and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?