Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Bayse v. Ward et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Robbin Amanda Bayse and Robert Bayse
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Sharon Lewis, Jauel Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clement et al v. CSC of Cobb County Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05806
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo E. Clement and Ken Morton
Defendant:
CSC of Cobb County Inc., Hood Clayton Logistics LLC and The Kroger Co.
Weaver v. CoreCivic et al
as 5:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Windell Weaver
Defendant:
CoreCivic, William Danforth, Ricky Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Ward et al
as 5:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Alvin Stanley
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Damon Hininger, Warden Danforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Telfair County et al
as 3:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jonathan C. Davis
Defendant:
Telfair County, Edwin Neal, Annie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clement v. Mitsubishi Financial Group
as 1:2022cv03387
Plaintiff:
Barton L. Clement
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Financial Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Stanley v. Danforth et al
as 5:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Alvin Gamar Stanley
Defendant:
Warden Danforth, Warden Ricky Stone, Chief Malcom Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
