Cases 1 - 10 of 276
Gaynor v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Clifford Gaynor
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and Centurion of Florida, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiggs v. Slater et al
as 3:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Tavorris Tiggs
Defendant:
Julia Slater, Clifford Rhoades and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiggs v. Slater et al
as 4:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
Tavorris Tiggs
Defendant:
Julia Slater and Clifford Rhoades
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. DuttLinger et al
as 1:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Marvin Bernard Tucker and Tuck
Defendant:
Ronald DuttLinger, Donna Young, Deputy Warden Karl Fort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Senter v. Jansen
as 2:2023cv01073
Petitioner:
Clifford Senter
Respondent:
Sean Jansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tiggs v. Slater et al
as 3:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Tavorris Tiggs
Defendant:
Julia Slater and Clifford Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
as 5:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
Clifford Wood
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Crittenden v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Clifford L. Crittenden
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madison v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Clifford Sinclair Madison
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Mr. Williams and Mr. Limpkens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifford Reid v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 23-10788
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLIFFORD LEON REID
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
