Cases 11 - 20 of 351
Fantel v. Maricopa, County of
as 2:2023cv02116
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fantel v. White et al
as 2:2023cv01725
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
Julia White, Scott Nieman, Dean Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifford Chaun Loyer v. Jason Black
as 2:2023cv06080
Petitioner:
Clifford Chaun Loyer
Respondent:
Jason Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Goodwin, III v. USA
as 23-35492
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES CLIFFORD GOODWIN III
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Clifford Chaun Loyer v. Jason Black et al
as 2:2023cv06070
Plaintiff:
Clifford Chaun Loyer
Defendant:
Warden Jason Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifford Chaun Loyer v. Jeffrey Davis et al
as 2:2023cv06051
Plaintiff:
Clifford Chaun Loyer
Defendant:
Dr Jeffrey Davis and Alejandro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifford Chaun Loyer v. Jason Black et al
as 2:2023cv05469
Plaintiff:
Clifford Chaun Loyer
Defendant:
Jason Black, Davis and Stirling Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifford C. Loyer v. Stirling Price
as 2:2023cv05380
Petitioner:
Clifford C. Loyer and Clifford Chaun Loyer
Respondent:
Sterling Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifford Loyer v. Sterling Price
as 2:2023cv05131
Petitioner:
Clifford C. Loyer and Clifford Chaun Loyer
Respondent:
Sterling Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Sellers et al
as 1:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Clifford Lee Bennett
Defendant:
Christina Sellers, SB RN, UT RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
