Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv02072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lenius et al v. John Deere Agri Services, Inc et al SEE ENTRY [11] FOR DISMISSAL OF DEF DEERE
as 6:2012cv02063
Plaintiff:
Wanda Jo Lenius and Gary Gene Lenius
Defendant:
Clyde D'Cruz , Kevin Keith , Brian Matson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv02050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Reid v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv06071
Plaintiff:
Donnie Reid
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Wendy Kelley, Corizon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish et al v. Dayton et al
as 0:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Parrish , Dana Akre , Addie Clyde and others
Defendant:
Mark Dayton and Josh Tilsen
Movant:
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Marlin Jones v. HUD, et al
as 10-2051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marlin E. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Department of Housing and Urban Development, John Does and Clyde B. Blandford, Executive Director of HUD
Rosenkoetter v. City of Gerald, Missouri et al
as 4:2010cv00791
Plaintiff:
Andrew S Rosenkoetter
Defendant:
City of Gerald, Missouri, Clyde F Zelch and Ryan N McCrary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
