Cases 31 - 40 of 4,066
Richards et al v. Calero
as 8:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Clyde Richards and Marcia Reddon
Defendant:
Gloriangeli Calero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Harper v. State of Nebraska et al
as 1:2024cv01726
Plaintiff:
Clyde Ernest Harper
Defendant:
State of Nebraska and State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley et al v. Chevron USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2024pq00505
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Clyde Dudley and Linda Dudley
Defendant:
Chevron USA, Inc., Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lancaster v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv00453
Petitioner:
Clyde Lancaster, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanley v. Kalamazoo, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Stanley
Defendant:
City of Kalamazoo, Integrated Services of Kalamazoo, Bronson Methodist Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Dayton et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00849
Plaintiff:
Glenda M. Dayton and Clyde W. Dayton
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc., Exactech U.S., Inc., TPG Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson et al v. Holley et al
as 4:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Clyde Thompson, Crystal Ashley, Cayden Thompson and others
Defendant:
James Holley and Anthony P&L, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Clyde Thompson, Crystal Ashley, Cayden Thompson and others
Defendant:
James Holley and Anthony P&L, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
