Cases 41 - 50 of 136
HOLLAND v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2016cv00331
Plaintiff:
CLYDE FRANKLIN HOLLAND
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, ROBINSON, FYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Omanwa v. Catoosa County et al
as 4:2016cv00211
Plaintiff:
Kennedy N Omanwa
Defendant:
Catoosa County , Rick Quarles , Gary Sisk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Hininger et al
as 5:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Stacy Clyde Palmer
Defendant:
Damon T. Hininger, Homer Bryson, Hilton Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhyne v. EQ The Environmental Quality Company
as 1:2015cv03697
Plaintiff:
Clyde John Rhyne
Defendant:
EQ The Environmental Quality Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Georgia Advocacy Office, Inc. v. Reese
as 1:2015cv03372
Plaintiff:
Georgia Advocacy Office, Inc.
Defendant:
Clyde L. Reese, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker et al v. Ours et al
as 2:2015cv00097
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Tucker and Ironman Wrecker Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Alan Ours, Mike Browning, Mark Stambaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Georgiev et al
as 1:2015cv02530
Plaintiff:
Clyde Hunt, Jr.
Defendant:
Biser S. Georgiev , MBM Food Service, Inc. , Meadowbrook Meat Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
H. et al v. Reese
as 1:2015cv01427
Plaintiff:
M. H. , Thelma Lynah , S. R. and others
Defendant:
Clyde L. Reese, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis et al v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
as 1:2014cv03838
Plaintiff:
K. Wendell Lewis , Darrell L. Abby , Jack L. Abernathy, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation , Sally Quillian Yates, Eric Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1303
Calhoun v. Day et al
as 1:2014cv01319
Plaintiff:
Clyde Calhoun
Defendant:
Charles T. Day, III and Tidewater Finance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
