Cases 31 - 40 of 500
Coca-Cola Company The et al
as 2:2023cv02381
Defendant:
Coca-Cola Company The
Plaintiff:
Nicole Fritch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
The Coca-Cola Company v. SuperCooler Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01323
Plaintiff:
The Coca-Cola Company
Defendant:
SuperCooler Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Reynolds v. The Coca-Cola Company
as 3:2023cv01446
Plaintiff:
Gary Reynolds
Defendant:
The Coca-Cola Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hansen v. The Coca-Cola Company
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jessica Hansen
Defendant:
The Coca-Cola Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hiedger et al v. The Coca-Cola Company
as 4:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Melanie Hiedger and Does 1 - 10
Defendant:
The Coca-Cola Company and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Osburn v. Arby's Ohio, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv00598
Plaintiff:
Georgette Osburn
Defendant:
Arby's Ohio, LLC, Arby's 5906, Mosaic RBFL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ebrahimi v. Fields et al
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Shamim Ebrahimi
Defendant:
Michael R. Fields, Netflix, Inc., Electronic Arts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Spittal et al v. The Coca-Cola Company
as 3:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
David Spittal, Jr., Rebecca Crampton and Mete Karabas
Defendant:
The Coca-Cola Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Hawkins v. The Coca-Cola Company
as 1:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Natasha Hawkins
Defendant:
The Coca-Cola Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
SuperCooler Technologies, Inc. v. The Coca Cola Company
as 6:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
SuperCooler Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
The Coca Cola Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
