Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Spalding v. NLN (3:23-cv-285)
as 3:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
David Lyman Spalding
Defendant:
NFN NLN (3:23-cv-285), Coleen Peters, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovas v. DXC Technology Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Coleen Lovas
Defendant:
DXC Technology Company, Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Inc. and Hewlett Packard Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Canadian Real Estate Holdings, LP v. Karen F. Newton Revocable Trust et al.
as 4:2021cv00333
Defendant:
KAREN F. NEWTON REVOCABLE TRUST, Richard Vanmeter, Kristin Trotter and others
Plaintiff:
CANADIAN REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Coleen & Company, Inc. v. Old World Design L.L.C.
as 4:2020cv00647
Defendant:
Old World Design, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Coleen & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
KAREN F. NEWTON REVOCABLE TRUST et al v. CANADIAN REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LP
as 4:2019cv00429
Plaintiff:
SANDRA GRAHAM, DEBBIE CHESNEY, JANET ANDERS and others
Defendant:
CANADIAN REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Compass Bank v. Wallace et al
as 5:2017cv00247
Plaintiff:
Compass Bank
Defendant:
Ronald Archie Wallace and Debbra Coleen Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00362
Plaintiff:
Carmen Acevedo, Grayce W. Amick, Maritza Arroyo and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., American Medical Systems, Inc., Atrium Medical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Robinson v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00163
Plaintiff:
Brenda Coleen Robinson
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
