Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Cain v. Bladen County et al
as 7:2023cv01452
Plaintiff:
William Colt Cain
Defendant:
N C Bladen County, James A. McVicker, Michael Hal Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1250 COLTS PRIDE DRIVE, FAYETTEVILLE, CEDAR CREEK TOWNSHIP, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON et al
as 1:2019cv01148
Defendant:
1250 COLTS PRIDE DRIVE, FAYETTEVILLE, CEDAR CREEK TOWNSHIP, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON, 1857 TRYON DRIVE, UNIT 2, FAYETTEVILLE, ROCKFISH TOWNSHIP, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON and 625 SPENCER FARLOW DRIVE, UNIT 3-30, CAROLINA BEACH, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. Approximately 1439 Sabre Defence Industries M16 A2, A3, and A4 5.56 caliber machine guns et al
as 1:2016cv00359
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately 1439 Sabre Defence Industries M16 A2, A3, and A4 5.56 caliber machine guns, Approximately 538 Manroy XR16 5.56 caliber machine guns, Approximately 124 Sabre Defence Industries XR16 5.56 caliber machine guns and others
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. 2012 GMC Savana Van et al
as 2:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2012 GMC Savana Van, 2012 Toyota Tacoma, 2012 F350 DRW Super Duty Pickup Truck and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. A Remington .22 Caliber et al
as 7:2011cv00256
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Diaz-Rosas Personal Property, Specifically Described as a Remington .22 Caliber, Model 5501 Rifle with no serial number, A Savage 12 Gauge, A Colt .22 LR Caliber Handgun and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0924
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
