Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Goodman v. Nolan Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv11401
Plaintiff:
Terrell Goodman
Defendant:
Nolan Associates, LLC, d/b/a Boston Harbor Cruises, M/V Commander, LLC and Nolan Associates, LLC doing business as Boston Harbor Cruises
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SAYED v. Military Sealift Command
as 1:2021cv10947
Plaintiff:
WALEED SAYED and Military Sealift Command
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Murphy v. Baker et al
as 3:2017cv30021
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charlie Baker, Maura Healy, Karen Polito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deegan v. Mabus et al
as 1:2015cv13095
Plaintiff:
Sally Anne Deegan
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, Navy Criminal Investigative Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Makowiec v. Dept of Defense
as 1:2015cv11859
Plaintiff:
Sara Makowiec
Defendant:
US Department of Defense, US Army Research and Development Command, Defense Accounting and Finance Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Sparks v. US Army Central Command (ARCENT)
as 1:2015cv11291
Plaintiff:
Brian Sparks
Defendant:
US Army Central Command (ARCENT)
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Grannum v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2013cv12042
Plaintiff:
Kevin Grannum
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, City of Boston, City of Fall River and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stalcup v. Naval Special Warfare Command
as 1:2013cv11966
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stalcup
Defendant:
Naval Special Warfare Command
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Lax v. Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv11276
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lax
Defendant:
Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc., Joseph P. Caruso, Jeanne Cohane and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
