Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors
as 25-3000
Plaintiff: Corner Post, Inc.
Defendant: Board of Governors, of the Federal Reserve System
Appellant: Advancing American Freedom, Frontline Policy Council, Charlie Gerow and others
Amicus Curiae: Retail Litigation Center, Inc., Food Marketplace, Inc., doing business as FMI, The Food Industry Association, Merchant Advisory Group and others
Texas Top Cop Shop v. Bondi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 24-40792
Plaintiff: Libertarian Party of Mississippi, Mustardseed Livestock, L.L.C., Data Comm for Business, Incorporated and others
Defendant: Treasury Department, Janet Yellen, Secretary, U.S. Department of Treasury, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and others
Amicus Curiae: Eagle Forum Education and Legal Defense Fund, Private Investor Coalition, Incorporated, Community Associations Institute and others
Unknown: Advancing American Freedom, New Civil Liberties Alliance, The Buckeye Institute and others
National Horsemen's Benevolent v. Black We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-10520
Plaintiff / Appellant: National Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association, Arizona Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association, Arkansas Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: State of Texas and Texas Racing Commission
Defendant / Appellee: Jerry Black, Katrina Adams, Leonard Coleman and others
Amicus Curiae: North American Association of Racetrack Veterinarians, American Quarter Horse Association, Reason Foundation and others
Competitive Enterprise Institute, et al v. EPA
as 22-1032
Petitioner: Competitive Enterprise Institute, Anthony Kreucher, Walter M. Kreucher and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE v. MCCARTHY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01238
Defendant: OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, NATIONAL CLIMATE TASK FORCE and others
Plaintiff: COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Berns v. Labaton Sucharow LLP, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1069
Plaintiff: ANDOVER COMPANIES EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN, WILLIAM R. TAYLOR, ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated and others
Interested Party: WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING, LLP, GERALD E. ROSEN, MCTIGUE LAW, LLP and others
Defendant: STATE STREET GLOBAL MARKETS, LLC, STATE STREET CORPORATION and STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
Competitive Enterprise Inst., et al v. NHTSA, et al
as 20-1145
Petitioner: Anthony Kreucher, Marc Scribner, Competitive Enterprise Institute and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and others
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Berns v. Labaton Sucharow LLP, et al
as 20-1365
Plaintiff: ANDOVER COMPANIES EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN, ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated and JAMES PEHOUSHEK-STANGELAND
Interested Party: KELLER RORHBACK L.L.P., GERALD E. ROSEN, WILLIAM R. TAYLOR and others
Defendant: STATE STREET GLOBAL MARKETS, LLC, STATE STREET CORPORATION and STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
Robinson Enterprises, Inc., et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-1175
Petitioner: Robinson Enterprises, Inc., Texas Public Policy Foundation, Norman R. Brown and others
Respondent: Andrew Wheeler and Environmental Protection Agency
COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
as 1:2018cv02900
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Plaintiff: COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?