Cases 31 - 40 of 43
United States v. Christopher Thomas Condon
as 12-3491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Christopher Thomas Condon
Campbell v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2012cv03193
Defendant:
Gengony Abbott, Keith C. Allensten, Jr., Lanet S. Asmussen and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Condon v. West Des Moines Community School District et al
as 4:2010cv00552
Plaintiff:
Ethel Faust Condon
Defendant:
West Des Moines Community School District and Heartland Area Education Agency 11
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Faust Condon v. West Des Moines Community School District et al
as 4:2010cv00301
Defendant:
West Des Moines Community School District and Heartland Area Education Agency 11
Plaintiff:
Ethel Faust Condon
Third_party_defendant:
James Faust
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Condon-Patel v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2010cv02220
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Condon-Patel
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bayoumy v. Jacox et al
as 0:2010cv00352
Plaintiff:
Tamer Bayoumy
Defendant:
Willis Jacox, William Condon and Hennepin, County of
Condon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2009cv03077
Plaintiff:
Pamela A Condon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Mahler et al v. American Bank & Trust Co., N.A. et al
as 3:2009cv00068
Plaintiff:
Michael E Mahler and Great River LC
Defendant:
John P Condon, JP Condon Inc and American Bank & Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Mahler, et al v JP Condon Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00002
Plaintiff:
Michael E Mahler and Great River LC
Defendant:
JP Condon Inc and John P Condon
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
