Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Conger v. Houser
as 2:2022cv00003
Petitioner:
Emerson Scott Conger
Respondent:
Earl L. Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin et al v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2017cv01924
Defendant:
Christopher Barton, Clackamas County, Timothy Conger and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Brinkman v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 13-16000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT L. BRINKMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of Corrections, Central Office, MIKE LINDERMAN, Central Office, UNKNOWN CREDIO, named as Credio, Warden at Eyman, Florence and others
Hans Reiser v. William Du Bois, et al
as 13-15694
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HANS REISER
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM H. DU BOIS, ROBERT NAVARRO, RICHARD E. JAMAR and others
Hans Reiser v. William Du Bois, et al
as 13-15437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HANS REISER
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM H. DU BOIS, ROBERT NAVARRO, RICHARD E. JAMAR and others
Anthony Mack v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 12-17347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY EDWARD MACK
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of California, KAMALA HARRIS, State Attorney General, STEVEN C. WOLAN, Public Defender and others
Brinkman #133444 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv01493
Plaintiff:
Albert L Brinkman
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Mike Linderman, Unknown Credio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Brown et al
as 4:2012cv02517
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Kamala Harris, Steven C. Wolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman v. Schriro et al
as 4:2012cv00011
Plaintiff:
Albert L Brinkman
Defendant:
Dora B Schriro, Charles L Ryan, Ivan Bartos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reiser v. Du Bois et al
as 4:2011cv04735
Plaintiff:
Hans Reiser
Defendant:
William H Du Bois, Robert Navarro, Richard E. Jamar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
