Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Teetz v. Sedgwick County, Kansas et al
as 6:2022cv01134
Plaintiff:
Marquan Teetz
Defendant:
Sedgwick County, Kansas, Jason Stepien, Brenton Newby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Link v. Lawrence Memorial Hospital et al
as 2:2022cv02111
Plaintiff:
Dawn Link
Defendant:
Lawrence Memorial Hospital doing business as LMH HEALTH, Blake Conklin, Megan Pedersen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Sack v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
James Sack
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Sherwood, Conklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gill et al
as 2:2021cv00112
Defendant:
Rosie Rivera, Andrew Conklin, Sean Reyes and others
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Plaintiff:
Bryce Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Company v. Advanced Neuro Solutions, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00572
Defendant:
Surgery Inc., Jeff Krigel Law Firm, Surgical Device Exchange, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Flynn et al
as 1:2019cv02192
Defendant:
Benjamin Terrell Walton, Brian Conklin, Brian Feuselier and others
Plaintiff:
John Edward Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ade v. Conklin Cars Salina
as 19-3131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JILLIAN ADE
Defendant / Appellee:
CONKLIN CARS SALINA, LLC
Kibel v. Williams et al
as 1:2019cv00754
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Conklin, Jason Guidry and others
Plaintiff:
Jason G. Kibel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conklin v. Coffman
as 1:2019cv00377
Respondent:
Cynthia H. Coffman
Petitioner:
Jason Allan Conklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01933
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
