Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Royer v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv02081
Plaintiff:
Connor Joseph Royer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gatlin v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Connor Gatlin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Soles v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv02866
Plaintiff:
Connor Donald Soles
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CONNOR-MOORE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv03196
Plaintiff:
CHASTITY CONNOR-MOORE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Connors v. Saul
as 2:2021cv03792
Plaintiff:
Melissa Ann Connors
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Connors v. Saul
as 4:2020cv02338
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Christina Marie Connors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Roche v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv05880
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Connor T Roche
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Connor v. Saul
as 1:2020cv04957
Plaintiff:
Kika Lynn Connor
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Donnelly v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv00614
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Kate Connor Donnelly
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Connors v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00232
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Connors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
