Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Jacobs v. Continental American Insurance Company
as 7:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
Conrad Jacobs
Defendant:
Continental American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jacobs v. Continental American Insurance Company
as 5:2023cv00690
Plaintiff:
Conrad Jacobs
Defendant:
Continental American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Meyers v. Reidinger et al
as 3:2023cv00812
Defendant:
David Meyers, Martin Reidinger, Graham Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONRAD v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00992
Plaintiff:
MARTHA CONRAD
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
CONRAD v. USA
as 1:2023cv00745
Petitioner:
XAVIER LANIER CONRAD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gaskins v. Stegall et al
as 3:2023cv00427
Petitioner:
Latosha Denise Gaskins
Respondent:
C. Stegall, Trent Conrad and City of Gastonia Police Department
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rogers et al v. Cumberland County et al
as 5:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Kahleighia N. Rogers, L.R., K.B. and others
Defendant:
Cumberland County, Brenda Reid-Jackson, Megan P. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DUNBAR v. ALI et al
as 1:2022cv00597
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER DUNBAR
Defendant:
ADDUL RAHMAN EL ALI, JACK LAMBERT, CLAY MAGUIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Conrad v. Ramos
as 5:2021ct03364
Plaintiff:
Randall Lee Conrad
Defendant:
Warden Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCALLISTER v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00786
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, ROCKY JOYNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
