Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Yolanda Gill v. Dominique Ross, et al
as 25-2690
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA S. GILL
Defendant:
DOMINIQUE ROSS, CHERYL INGRAM, MATTHEW INGRAM and others
Thompson v. Boyd et al
as 1:2025cv01754
Plaintiff:
Rashida Thompson
Defendant:
William Stewart Boyd, Dominique Ross, Vickie Pasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Bowes et al
as 1:2025cv00705
Plaintiff:
Miriam N. Jackson
Defendant:
Karen Bowes, Julie Aimen, Erin Masters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gill v. Ross et al
as 1:2024cv12761
Defendant:
Arlette Porter, Dominique Ross, Cook County Government and others
Plaintiff:
Yolanda S. Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bowes-Northern v. Miller et al
as 1:2021cv06195
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Defendant:
Latesha C. Miller, City of Markham, Cook County Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowes-Northern v. Cook County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2021cv04675
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Defendant:
Cook County Circuit Court, Cook County State Attorney Office, Markham Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
BOWES-NORTHERN v. COOK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT et al
as 1:2021cv02343
Plaintiff:
SHEDRICK BOWES-NORTHERN
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, COOK COUNTY STATE ATTORNEY OFFICE, MARKHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp
Pinkney v. Officer et al
as 1:2020cv00829
Defendant:
Cook County Government, Tom Dart and Transportation Officer
Plaintiff:
James Edward Pinkney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
