Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
KINCHEL v. CAULFIELD et al
as 2:2022cv05242
Plaintiff: MAURICE ANTHONY KINCHEL
Defendant: JUDGE REGINA CAUFIELD, WILLIAM A. DANIEL, LISA GREY-STACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Virgo Virgillio v. Sally Riddicks, et al
as 20-3641
Defendant / Appellee: SALLY RIDDICKS and THOMAS CORBETS
Plaintiff / Appellant: VIRGO VIRGILLIO
Nieves v. State of Pennsylvania et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01253
Plaintiff: Luis Nieves
Defendant: State of Pennsylvania, Lackawanna County, County and State Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steinberg v. CEB Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00226
Plaintiff: Chaile Steinberg
Defendant: CEB Inc., Thomas L. Monahan, III, Gregor S. Bailar and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
VIRGO v. RIDDRICKS et al
as 5:2016cv04967
Plaintiff: VIRGILLIO VIRGO
Defendant: SALLY RIDDRICKS and THOMAS CORBETS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VIRGILLIO v. RIDDICKS et al
as 5:2016cv04842
Plaintiff: VIRGO VIRGILLIO
Defendant: SALLY RIDDICKS and THOMAS CORBETS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JACKSON v. MOORE et al
as 2:2015cv01622
Petitioner: NEIL D. JACKSON
Respondent: RAYMOND MOORE and TOM CORBET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Earl Pondexter We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-3451
Petitioner: In re: EARL A. PONDEXTER
Respondent: GOVERNOR THOMAS CORBET, PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION, GERALD ROBINSON, Chairman and others
Nominal Respondent: NORA B. FISCHER
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-3366
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
THORNTON v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2011cv07468
Petitioner: DONALD THORNTON
Respondent: MICHAEL HARLOW, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TOM CORBET and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CHESTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?