Cases 61 - 70 of 506
Abbott v. Corizon, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00642
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC, Corizon Inc., Woodrow A. Meyers, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez (ID 71264) v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv03095
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc., Ziavddin Monir and Nancy Ciskey
Plaintiff:
Chilo Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #619752 v. Davids et al
as 1:2019cv00402
Defendant:
James Leland, Unknown Spear, Corizon Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ashton A. Smith #619752
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamont Williamson v. Mina Massey
as 19-1898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lamont Williamson
Defendant:
Ian Wallace, John Doe, Nurse, Dana Degen and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Mina Massey
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10944
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Care of Michigan, P.C. and Corizon, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10616
Defendant:
Keith Papendick, William Borgerding, Chris Steece and others
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10615
Defendant:
Keith Papendick, William Borgerding, Chris Steece and others
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Withers v. USDC-AZP
as 19-70376
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Petitioner:
MICHAEL V. WITHERS
Undetermined:
JOANNA GRAFTON-BURNS, Nurse Practitioner at Corizon and CORIZON, INC.
Other:
In re: MICHAEL V. WITHERS
Yancey v. The County of Albany
as 19-320
Defendant:
County of Albany, Daniel F. Lynch, County Attorney, Corizon, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael C. Yancey
Defendant / Appellee:
Douglas Robertson, Corrections Officer, Albany County Correctional Facility, FKA John Doe
Rutkofske #685509 v. Sices et al
as 1:2019cv00083
Defendant:
Corizon Inc. and P. Sices
Plaintiff:
Douglas Rutkofske #685509
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
