Cases 31 - 40 of 127
THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR PHILLIPS et al v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03822
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR PHILLIPS and PHYLLIS PHILLIPS
Defendant:
DR. JOHN DOE, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., HANNAH JENKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyree Jackson v. Corizon Health Inc, et al
as 19-2740
Defendant / Appellee:
ALMEDIA FRIAS, CORIZON HEALTH INC and VIVIAN GANDY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYREE JACKSON
Charles Talbert v. Correctional Dental Associates, et al
as 19-2369
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. PATEL, SIGY GEORGE, DR. FOWLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES TALBERT
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01942
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 16-18, JOHN DOE 1-3, JOHN DOE 10-12 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alton Brown v. Wexford Health Sources Inc, et al
as 19-1809
Defendant / Appellee:
ARTHUR M. SANTOS, W. A. MYERS, JR., CORIZON HEALTH INC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN R. BEABOUT
PARKER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01294
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CORIZON HEALTH INC.
Plaintiff:
KEVIN PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. CORRECTIONAL DENTAL ASSOCIATES et al
as 2:2018cv05112
Defendant:
SIDDHARTH SAGREIYA, SIGY GEORGE, EDWARD BOWMAN and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSE v. CORIZON HEALTH INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04650
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROSE
Defendant:
MS. ROSE and CORIZON HEALTH INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORDON v. CORIZON HEALTH INC.
as 2:2018cv04490
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GORDON
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL-EPISCOPAL CAMPUS et al
as 2:2018cv04303
Defendant:
SIDDHARTHA SAGREIYA OR SAGVEIYA, "UNKNOWN" SHELLENBERGER, MEGAN SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
