Cases 11 - 20 of 47
TALBERT v. CORIZON INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05545
Defendant:
JEAN PATEL, KIMBERLEE ADAMS, CORIZON INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv03892
Plaintiff:
DANTE JACKSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, WATKINS, KAREN BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEHRLI v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00977
Plaintiff:
CATHY WEHRLI
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY , ORLANDO HARPER , CORIZON HEALTH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv02372
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND CLARK
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORIZON INC., JIM KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROSS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv01487
Plaintiff:
RAMAR CROSS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JIM KENNEY, MICHAEL R. RESNICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUNSIL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv01040
Plaintiff:
BARRETT S. TUNSIL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, KENNEY, RESNICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT et al v. KENNEY et al
as 2:2016cv00996
Plaintiff:
WALTER SCOTT and PRZEMYSLAW GRYCZEWSKI
Defendant:
JIM KENNEY, MICHAEL RESNICK, G. MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT et al v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2016cv00197
Plaintiff:
WALTER SCOTT and PRZENYSLAW GRYCZEWSKI
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, MICHELLE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRYCZEWSKI et al v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
PRZEMYSLAW GRYCZEWSKI
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, MICHELLE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Lomax v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 15-3452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN LOMAX
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MAYOR PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
