Cases 1 - 10 of 508
Robert Dykes-Bey v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 24-1907
Defendant:
WENDY JAMROS, Nurse Practioner, CORIZON, INC., Medical Provider for Michigan Department of Corrections, TIMOTHY STALLMAN, MD and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. DYKES-BEY
Robert Dykes-Bey v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 24-1827
Defendant:
WENDY BALL, Nurse Manager, PATRICIA WILLARD, Dietician, STEVE ADAMSON, Special Activities Coordinator and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. DYKES-BEY
Sanchez II v. Corizon Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv02377
Plaintiff:
Henry Sanchez II
Defendant:
Corizon Inc., Yes Care, Mrs. Wheatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark White v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 23-1283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK EARL WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON, INC., DOCTOR RICKEY J. COLEMAN, Acting Chief Medical Officer, DOCTOR PETER E. SICES and others
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, KRISTIE BADDER, E. COE HILL and others
Moore v. Valley III et al
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jimmy C Moore
Defendant:
Randy Valley III, Rona Siegert, Corizon Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Lott v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 23-1105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW LESLIE LOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON, INC., R. JINDELL, Physician Assistant, PETER SCICES, Medical Doctor and others
Kay Dana v. Idaho Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-35047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAY LYNN DANA, FKA Larry Dana
Defendant / Appellee:
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSH TEWALT, BREE DERRICK and others
Byrd v. Corizon, LLC, et al
as 5:2023cv06005
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC,, Corizon, Inc., Corizon, Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeri Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
