Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Harris et al v. Swiss Re American Holding Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv07059
Plaintiff: Shawyne Harris, Robert Taylor and Sidney Dasent
Defendant: Swiss Re American Holding Corporation, Board of Directors of Swiss Re American Holding Corporation, Swiss Re American Holding Corporation Governance & Nomination Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Morales v Capital One Financial Corporation
as 1:2021cv01454
Plaintiff: Raul Morales
Defendant: Capital One Financial Corporation, The Board of Directors of Capital One Financial Corporation, Capital One Financial Corporation Investment Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Baumeister et al v. Exelon Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv06505
Plaintiff: Fred Baumeister, Kenneth Berkeihiser, Dwayne Clauser and others
Defendant: Exelon Corporation, Investment Oversight Committee, Board of Directors of Exelon Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae: U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Amicus Curiae the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Riley et al v. Olin Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv01328
Plaintiff: Malika Riley and Takeeya Reliford
Defendant: Olin Corporation, Board of Directors of Olin Corporation, Olin Corporation Investment Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Riley et al v. Olin Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00161
Plaintiff: Malika Riley and Takeeya Reliford
Defendant: Olin Corporation, Board of Directors of Olin Corporation, Olin Corporation Investment Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Meriwether v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv05825
Plaintiff: Lavarita D Meriwether
Defendant: Sears Holdings Corporation, Edward S Lampert, Sears Holdings Corporation Administrative Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Catalfamo v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv05230
Plaintiff: Robert A. Catalfamo and Lavarita D Meriwether
Defendant: Sears Holdings Corporation, Edward S. Lampert, Sears Holdings Corporation Investment Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Scholl et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 5:2017cv00279
Plaintiff: David A Scholl , Brian K Glover and Dennis W Vaughn
Defendant: Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Energy Corporation Benefits Committee, Chesapeake Energy Corporation Investment Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Richard, et al v. State Street Bank and Trust Co, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1597
Plaintiff - Appellee: CASEY J. RICHARD, MARILYN DEMORY, TIMOTHY W. HILL, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party - Appellant: CHARLES F. FRANZ and NITA W. FRANZ
Defendant - Appellee: STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, NORTH AMERICAN BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF STATE STREET CORPORATION, STATE STREET CORPORATION, INVESTMENT COMMITTEE and others
Defendant: RICHARD LOGUE and LEHMAN BROTHERS INC.
Interested Party: MIAMI BEACH EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN, THOMAS U. KENNEY and NATIONAL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER INDUSTRY WELFARE FUND
Richard, et al v. State Street Bank and Trust Co, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1193
Plaintiff - Appellee: CASEY J. RICHARD, MARILYN DEMORY, TIMOTHY W. HILL, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party - Appellant: CHARLES F. FRANZ and NITA W. FRANZ
Defendant - Appellee: STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, NORTH AMERICAN BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF STATE STREET CORPORATION, STATE STREET CORPORATION, INVESTMENT COMMITTEE and others
Movant: MIAMI BEACH EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN
Interested Party: THOMAS U. KENNEY and NATIONAL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER INDUSTRY WELFARE FUND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?