Cases 41 - 50 of 163
Multistar Industries v. Gettel Ocala et al
as 2:2019cv00182
Defendant:
Cadillac Motors, General Motors Corporation, Love Chevrolet Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Multistar Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TOMICKI v. HANDEX CONSULTING & REMEDIATION, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv08791
Defendant:
XYZ CORPORATION I-V, HANDEX CONSULTING & REMEDIATION, LLC, JOHN DOE 1-V and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN TOMICKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RIVAS v. SANTANDER BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2018cv15580
Defendant:
SANTANDER BANK, N.A., XYZ CORPORATION I-V (these names being fictitious as their present identities are unknown), MICHAEL FUOCO, both individually and in his official and/or managerial capacity and others
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA RIVAS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv14829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv14772
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DYNAMIC DUO 8, LLC et al v. KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv14099
Plaintiff:
Maureace Snapp, Dynamic Duo 8, LLC d/b/a Anthem Lounge and DYNAMIC DUO 8, LLC
Defendant:
KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY, JESUS PRADO, TROPICANA ATLANTIC CITY CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
OLIVOS v. DYNAMEX OPERATIONS EAST, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv13312
Plaintiff:
DAVID OLIVOS
Defendant:
XYZ CORPORATION I-V, JOHN DOE I-V, JANE DOE I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv13104
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv10503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv10012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
