Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Garcia v. Goodstein et al
as 3:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
Jerome Garcia
Defendant:
Diane S. Goodstein and SC DPS Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Wright v. South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce et al
as 3:2022cv03973
Plaintiff:
McKinley Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce, SEFA Transportation Inc., Supreme Court of South Carolina, The and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151 Labor: Review of Agency Action
Brown v. Court of Appeals et al
as 2:2021cv03486
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jerome Brown, Sr
Defendant:
Court of Appeals, Judge David C Norton, U.S. District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dizzley v. Hixson et al
as 2:2020cv02613
Defendant:
Gerogetown County Solicitors Office, Leah B Moody, Ronald Hazzard and others
Plaintiff:
Terron Gerhard Dizzley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Williams et al
as 6:2020cv01309
Defendant:
B Stirling, A M Wilson, Beth Drake and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Fischer et al
as 6:2018cv01576
Defendant:
Darnell Fischer, Judge Stilwell, Paul Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Lakessiah Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv00389
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Simonds v. Collins et al
as 0:2017cv03050
Plaintiff:
Odis Dwayne Simonds
Defendant:
Lisa Collins and SC Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. SC Supreme Court et al
as 0:2016cv01424
Defendant:
SC Supreme Court, Jean Toal, Kaye Hearn and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duren v. SC Supreme Court et al
as 0:2016cv01425
Plaintiff:
David Duren
Defendant:
SC Supreme Court, Jean Toal, Kaye Hearn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
