Cases 1 - 10 of 406
Maurice v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11037
Plaintiff:
Craig Maurice
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
dais deapocalypse bey v. Clapprood, et al
as 24-1312
Plaintiff:
RA DAIS DEAPOCALYPSE BEY
Defendant:
CHERYL CLAPPROOD, Superintendent, Springfield Police Department and CRAIG MOREL, President, CJ Towing
Parlon v. The United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2024cv10886
Plaintiff:
Joseph Patrick Parlon
Defendant:
The United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Shoba Sivaprassad Wadhia and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Parlon v. Hamel
as 1:2024cv10453
Plaintiff:
Joseph Patrick Parlon
Defendant:
Craig Hamel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Alves
as 1:2024cv10124
Petitioner:
Craig Smith
Respondent:
Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larocque v. Deschene et al
as 1:2023cv13252
Plaintiff:
Carl Larocque
Defendant:
Robert J. Deschene, Matthew M. Wisnewski, Craig Lussier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wallace v. Tompkins et al
as 1:2023cv12325
Petitioner:
Nickoyan Wallace
Respondent:
Steven W. Tompkins, Robert L. Ullmann, Mary K Ames and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CAFFREY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
CRAIG G CAFFREY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Anderson, et al v. Donovan, et al
as 23-1765
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATALIE ANDERSON and ANDRE C. BISASOR
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK E. DONOVAN, NH SUPREME COURT, NH RULES ADVISORY COMMITTEE and others
Interested Party:
CRAIG S. DONAIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
