Cases 51 - 60 of 24,022
Bar-Asher v. Playtika Holding Corp.
as 24-1003
Plaintiff:
LBMOTION LTD., IDAN BAR-ASHER and ARIC RAV TILMAN
Defendant:
PLAYTIKA HOLDING CORP., ROBERT ANTOKOL, CRAIG J. ABRAHAMS and others
Boudjerada, et al. v. Medary, et al.
as 24-2419
Plaintiff:
HASHEEM BOUDJERADA, DAMON COCHRAN-SALINAS, ERIN GRADY and others
Defendant:
SARAH MEDARY, Chief CHRIS SKINNER, CITY OF EUGENE and others
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC v. Beattie et al
as 0:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC doing business as Running Aces
Defendant:
Michael Beattie, Craig Beaulieu, Raymond Brenny and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Beisner v. Perion Network Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv02860
Plaintiff:
Craig Beisner
Defendant:
Perion Network Ltd., Doron Gerstel, Tal Jacobson and others
Bryant (ID 7323) v. Wichita Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv03055
Plaintiff:
Craig M. Bryant
Defendant:
Wichita Police Department, Kansas, State of, Paul O'Mara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moraski v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01794
Plaintiff:
Craig Moraski
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Ilg
as 24-2389
Defendant:
RONALD CRAIG ILG and Scar215
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Burbank v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2024cv02050
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Burbank
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Giles et al v. Sabert Corporation
as 1:2024cv02996
Plaintiff:
Frederick Giles, marcus jones and Craig Riddle
Defendant:
Sabert Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Amspec, LLC v. Camin Cargo Control, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Amspec, LLC
Defendant:
Camin Cargo Control, Inc., Craig Rodrigue, Nicholas McClendon and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
