Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Lawson et al v. Hargett et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lawson, Gabe Hart, Victor Ashe and others
Defendant:
Tre Hargett, Mark Goins, Steven R. Finney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tennessee Equality Project Foundation, Inc. v. The City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv01044
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Equality Project Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
The City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, The City Council of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, Shane McFarland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks et al v. Cantrell et al
as 3:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
Grant Hicks, Tristan Nixon and Lucas Mario Nutt
Defendant:
Wesley Cantrell, Jonathan Fenoy, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garton v. Crouch et al
as 3:2021cv00338
Defendant:
Andrew Vallee, Joshua Melton, Donald Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Garton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00278
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00058
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00148
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lambert et al v. Davidson County, District Attorney
as 3:2019cv00893
Defendant:
Davidson County, District Attorney
Plaintiff:
Craig Lambert, I, Ladonna Lambert and Craig Lambert, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Primm v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2019cv00690
Defendant:
Rebecca Hunter, Tennessee Department of Human Resources, Debbie Inglis and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Primm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
