Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Cameron Williams v. Scott Frakes, et al
as 26-2437
Plaintiff:
Cameron Williams
Defendant:
Scott R. Frakes, Brad Hansen, Christopher Connelly and others
Quinn v. Gable
as 8:2026cv00215
Respondent:
Craig Gable
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
William J. Quinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Nebraska Department of correction et al
as 4:2026cv03016
Plaintiff:
Teon D. Hill
Defendant:
Nebraska Department of correction, Craig Gable and Full Intel Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Gable et al
as 8:2025cv00709
Plaintiff:
Gerald David Smith
Defendant:
Craig Gable, Taggart Boyd, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ely v. Jeffreys et al
as 4:2025cv03242
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J. Ely
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys and Craig Gable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nico Wofford v. Craig Gable, et al
as 25-2972
Petitioner:
Nico Wofford
Respondent:
Craig Gable, TSCI Warden and Rob Jeffreys, NDCS Director
Anthony Dan v. State of Nebraska, et al
as 25-2809
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Dan
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Cherl Finn, Medical Staff - individual capacity, Medical Staff, Medical Staff - individual capacity and others
Burton v. Jeffreys et al
as 4:2025cv03140
Petitioner:
Karnell Burton
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys, Craig Gable and Mike Hilger
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Portillo v. Delacruz et al
as 8:2025cv00003
Defendant:
Craig Gable, Jane Doe, Hotten and others
Plaintiff:
Herbey Portillo, V.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
as 8:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Monroe G. Evans, III
Defendant:
Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Craig Gable, Scott Busboom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
