Cases 61 - 70 of 90
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00943
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carey v. Sequans Communications S.A. et al
as 1:2011cv07555
Plaintiff:
Norman C. Carey
Defendant:
Sequans Communications S.A., Georges Karam, Deborah Choate and others
Movant:
Nancy Wolff and The Sequans Investor Group
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Ronald Boone, Sr., et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 11-56704
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BOONE, Sr., SHARON MOSBY, Estate of Ronald Boone and ESTATE OF RONALD EULICE BOONE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHARLES BECK, in his official capacity and others
Johnson v. Sequans Communications S.A. et al
as 1:2011cv06341
Plaintiff:
Donald Dean Johnson
Defendant:
Sequans Communications S.A. , Georges Karam , Deborah Choate and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01277
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Craig Miller, et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of A
as 11-1738
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CRAIG MILLER and NANCY MILLER
Defendant - Appellant:
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Craig Miller, et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of A
as 11-1232
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CRAIG MILLER and NANCY MILLER
Defendant - Appellant:
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Miller et al v. Navigators Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2010cv01780
Plaintiff:
Craig Miller and Dianna Miller
Defendant:
Navigators Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Lemkin v. Hahn Loeser & Parks et al
as 2:2010cv00665
Plaintiff:
Jack Lemkin
Defendant:
Hahn Loeser & Parks, Craig Miller and Mark Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Henderson v. Broadus et al
as 2:2010cv12674
Defendant:
Cordozar Calvin Broadus, Craig Miller, Keiwan Deshawn Spillman and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Henderson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
