Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Anderson, et al v. Donovan, et al
as 23-1765
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATALIE ANDERSON and ANDRE C. BISASOR
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK E. DONOVAN, NH SUPREME COURT, NH RULES ADVISORY COMMITTEE and others
Interested Party:
CRAIG S. DONAIS
Sinclair v. Sampson et al
as 1:2016cv00127
Plaintiff:
Leila C. Sinclair
Defendant:
Craig S. Sampson, Esq. , Kathleen J. Ennen , William E. Jenkins and others
Counter_claimant:
American National Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Leila C. Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Irish v. Irish
as 16-1053
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAWN E. IRISH
Defendant - Appellant:
CRAIG S. IRISH
Defendant - Appellee:
PEBBLE NUCLEAR, INC., f/k/a Nuclear Logistics, Inc. and ARON SEIKEN
Shippee v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2014cv13926
Petitioner:
Craig S. Shippee
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simas et al v. New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc., d/b/a New England Compounding Center et al
as 1:2013cv10943
Plaintiff:
Craig S Simas and Joan Simas
Defendant:
New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. and Ocean State Pain Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Irish v. Irish et al
as 1:2012cv12132
Plaintiff:
Dawn E. Irish
Defendant:
Craig S Irish, Pebble Nuclear, Inc. and Aron Seiken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
J. Arthur Trudeau Memorial Center et al v. Powell et al
as 1:2011cv00416
Plaintiff:
J. Arthur Trudeau Memorial Center , The Adeline LaPlante Memorial Center , The Arc of Blackstone Valley and others
Defendant:
Sandra M. Powell and Craig S. Stenning
Intervenor_plaintiff:
spurwink/ri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2011cv00113
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island , A. Ralph Mollis, Rhode Island Board of Elections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
