Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Taylor v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 4:2022cv00709
Plaintiff:
Domeneque D Taylor
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation, Evans Motors Inc, Hood & Stacy PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Steiner v. Arkansas Auto Group LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00414
Defendant:
Arkansas Auto Group LLC doing business as Arkansas Auto Group Inc and Credit Acceptance Corporation
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Steiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wallace v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 6:2019cv06081
Plaintiff:
Larry Wallace
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0277
Miller et al v. First Automotive Service Corporation et al
as 4:2018cv00502
Defendant:
John Does, First Automotive Service Corporation and Credit Acceptance Corporation
Plaintiff:
Christopher Miller and Kaci Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Melcher v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 4:2018cv00145
Plaintiff:
Deanna Melcher
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
Walker v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 2:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
Carla Walker
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brietz v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 4:2016cv00159
Plaintiff:
Edwin Brietz
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
Loftis v. Credit Acceptance Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv00496
Plaintiff:
Ralph Eddie Loftis
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation and Hosto & Buchan PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
