Cases 1 - 10 of 334
Norred v. TDCJ-CID Byrd Unit et al
as 4:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Norred
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID Byrd Unit, UTMB Correctional Division, Dr. Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Bush et al
as 3:2023cv02443
Plaintiff:
Cary A Ray
Defendant:
George Bush, Jr, Donald Trump, Ronald Reagan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Earth Root Holdings LLC v. Currie & Brown Inc
as 3:2023cv02446
Plaintiff:
Earth Root Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Currie & Brown Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Curry, Jr. v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv03144
Petitioner:
George Thomas Curry, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Death Penalty)
Curry v. Crestbrook Insurance Company
as 6:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Lisa Curry
Defendant:
Crestbrook Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Truist Bank v. USA Steel, LLC, et al
as 4:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank
Defendant:
USA Steel, LLC and Eric Reshon Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Currie v. USA
as 3:2023cv01865
Petitioner:
Marshall James Currie
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Shelton v. Shelton et al
as 6:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Donnel J. Shelton
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Sheriff Craig Shelton, Officer Anthony Garza and Dist. Attorney Tonda Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridgley v. Currie
as 4:2023cv02770
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ridgley
Defendant:
Tammy Currie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hillhouse et al
as 6:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Botie Hillhouse, Unidentified Deputies, Tony Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
