Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Curry v. Akers
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Robert Curry
Respondent:
Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiley v. Green, et al
as 0:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Allen Wiley II and Allen Wiley, III
Defendant:
David Green, Nicholas Cleverger, Tyler Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austin v. Franklin County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anthony W. Austin
Defendant:
Franklin County, Kentucky, Chris Quire, Nathan M. Doty and others
Debtor:
John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Watson et al
as 3:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Raymond Evans
Defendant:
Jamie Watson, Brandon Purnell and Logan Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry v. Miller et al
as 6:2019cv00197
Plaintiff:
Micheal Curry
Defendant:
B.J. Burkhart, Mitch Miller and Dillon Brock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Albers, et al v. The Medical Protective Co., Inc., et al
as 2:2019cv00088
Executor:
Stephen Carmen, Gordon Rister, Jodi Behrendt and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Rutter, Kelly Martin, Christina Rutter and others
Defendant:
Paul Vollman, Esq., Mike Lyon, Esq., Berkshire Hathaway and others
Petitioner:
West Chester Hospital, UC Health and West Chester Hospital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curry v. SSA
as 5:2017cv00428
Plaintiff:
Brett Curry
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Curry v. SSA
as 6:2015cv00196
Plaintiff:
Anthony Glenn Curry
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Commonwealth of Kentucky Transportation Cabinet v. Curry et al
as 5:2011cv00160
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Kentucky Transportation Cabinet
Defendant:
Larry Michael Curry, Jonna L. Curry and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
