Cases 41 - 50 of 181
WILLIAMS et al v. MACFARLANE GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv02747
Defendant:
BRIAN MCGOWAN, MACFARLANE GROUP, INC., MEDLEY OPPORTUNITY FUND LL, LP and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA WILLIAMS and MICHAEL STERMEL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Curry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv00798
Plaintiff:
Paige Lynn Curry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TAYLOR et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv00706
Plaintiff:
VERONICA TAYLOR , KAREEM CURRY , VERNON CURRY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
CURRY v. CARBOFIX ORTHOPEDICS, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00634
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CURRY
Defendant:
CARBOFIX ORTHOPEDICS, INC. , CARBOFIX IN ORTHOPEDICS LLC , PITANGO TRUST LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
CURRY v. BRITTAIN et al
as 5:2017cv04842
Petitioner:
HISHAMU CURRY
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTAIN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LEHIGH COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CURRIE v. NEVILLE GALVANIZING, INC.
as 2:2017cv00771
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY CURRIE
Defendant:
NEVILLE GALVANIZING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
CURRY v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC et al
as 2:2017cv02331
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CURRY
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 623
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
WILLIAMS v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CAREER AND TECHNICAL CENTER et al
as 2:2017cv00620
Plaintiff:
CHASTITY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CAREER AND TECHNICAL CENTER , LEONARD RICH , MARY KOSEK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROBINSON v. SMITH et al
as 2:2017cv01023
Petitioner:
CURRY ROBINSON
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
