Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Keystone RV Company
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jay Curry
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company
Other:
Michael Scopelitis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
CURRY v. APRIA HEALTHCARE, LLC
as 1:2023cv01153
Plaintiff:
Christine Curry
Defendant:
APRIA HEALTHCARE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
CURRY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2023cv07009
Plaintiff:
DAVID P. CURRY and DAVID P. CURRY, JR.
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CURRY v. SCHILLING et al
as 1:2022cv02465
Plaintiff:
DONTE CURRY
Defendant:
RACHAEL SCHILLING, HANNAH WINNINGHAM, J. BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2022cv02262
Plaintiff:
TYRONE SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, GERMAYNE CURRY, SCOTT NICKELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FARAFONOV v. NWOSISI et al
as 1:2022cv01099
Plaintiff:
ANDREY M FARAFONOV
Defendant:
IFUNEAYA LICHENA NWOSISI, RYAN WILSON MEARS, MICHELL WAYMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. NORTON et al
as 2:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
DONTE CURRY
Defendant:
NORTON and LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. FRANCO et al
as 1:2022cv00880
Plaintiff:
DONTE CURRY
Defendant:
MIGUEL FRANCO, WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES INC., CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA LEE SMITH
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, JAMEY NOEL, DONOVAN HARROD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
