Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Joe Harris v. Attorney General State of Alabama, et al
as 22-12454
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE CURTIS HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA, FREDRICK ALBERT, YOLANDA STOKES and others
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv29649
Plaintiff:
CURTIS HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joe Harris v. Attorney General, State of Alabama, et al
as 21-11978
Defendant / Appellee:
YOLANDA STOKES, A. SIMMONS, Probation Officer for the Montgomery U.S.P.O, sued in his individual capacity, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE CURTIS HARRIS
Harris v. Marshall et al (MAG+)
as 2:2020cv01016
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, A. Simmons, Yolanda Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Curtis Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv66863
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv01032
Defendant:
Derrick Cunningham and Wanda J. Robinson
Plaintiff:
Joe Curtis Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harris v. Carter et al
as 4:2010cv02079
Plaintiff:
Curtis Harris, Jr
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Carter, Sanders, Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ainsworth v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00376
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Ainsworth, Charlotte Ainsworth, Wanda Alexander and others
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
