Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hubert Richards v. Shevaun Harris, et al
as 23-12322
Plaintiff / Appellant: HUBERT RICHARDS
Defendant / Appellee: SHEVAUN HARRIS, CURTIS NEAL, JODI A. ZAKARIA and others
DOUGHERTY v. TOTSCH et al
as 2:2023cv14195
Plaintiff: KEVIN DOUGHERTY
Defendant: JOHN TOTSCH, RICHARD TOTSCH, TERRY RICHARS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DOUGHERTY v. TOTSCH et al
as 2:2023cv14193
Plaintiff: KEVIN DOUGHERTY
Defendant: JOHN TOTSCH, RICHARD TOTSCH, TERRY RICHARS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Oneal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00023
Plaintiff: Curtis Neal Jones
Defendant: Henderson Oneal, ll, Western Flyer Express, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
NEAL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv07268
Plaintiff: CURTIS NEAL
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Synchrony Bank We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00501
Amicus Curiae: Curtis Neal
Plaintiff: Roy Campbell
Defendant: J.C. Penney Company Inc., Synchrony Bank and J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01876
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Neal v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00022
Plaintiff: Curtis Neal
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Jones v. USA
as 3:2015cv00667
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Curtis Neal Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Curtis Flournoy v. Scott Crickmar
as 14-13860
Petitioner - Appellant: CURTIS NEAL FLOURNOY
Respondent - Appellee: SCOTT CRICKMAR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?