Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Sharp Packaging Services, LLC v. CytoDyn Inc.
as 1:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Sharp Packaging Services, LLC
Defendant:
CytoDyn Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LOESCH v. CYTODYN, INC.,
as 1:2022cv01308
Plaintiff:
DAVID LOESCH
Defendant:
CYTODYN, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
CytoDyn, Inc. v. Amarex Clinical Research, LLC et al
as 8:2021cv02533
Plaintiff:
CytoDyn, Inc.
Defendant:
Amarex Clinical Research, LLC and NSF International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hensley v. Pourhassan et al
as 3:2021cv05593
Plaintiff:
Billie Ray Hensley
Defendant:
Nader Z. Pourhassan, Scott A. Kelly, Michael Mulholland and others
Nominal Defendant:
CytoDyn, Inc. and CytoDyn Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CytoDyn Inc. v. Rosenbaum et al
as 1:2021cv01139
Plaintiff:
CytoDyn Inc.
Defendant:
Paul A. Rosenbaum, Jeffrey P. Beaty, Arthur L. Wilmes and others
Lavin v. Pourhassan et al
as 3:2021cv05465
Defendant:
Samir R. Patel, Nader Z. Pourhassan, Scott A. Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lavin
Nominal Defendant:
CytoDyn Inc
Berndt v. Kelly et al
as 3:2021cv05422
Defendant:
MD Samir R Patel, Jordan G Naydenov, MD Scott A Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
David Berndt
Nominal Defendant:
CytoDyn Inc
Alpha Venture Capital Partners, et al v. Nader Pourhassan, et al
as 21-35274
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN PETERSON, derivatively on behalf of CytoDyn Inc, CARACCIOLO FAMILY TRUST, GREGORY A. GOULD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NADER Z. POURHASSAN and CYTODYN, INC., Nominal; a Delaware corporation
Goodwin v. CytoDyn Inc et al
as 3:2021cv05260
Defendant:
Michael Mulholland, Nader Z Pourhassan and CytoDyn Inc
Plaintiff:
James Chris Goodwin
Petitioner:
Courter and Sons LLC, Kenneth Kirschenbaum, Ho Matt Chun and others
Lewis v. CytoDyn Inc et al
as 3:2021cv05190
Defendant:
Nader Z Pourhassan, Michael Mulholland and CytoDyn Inc
Plaintiff:
Angela Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
